Tuesday, October 27, 2009
After the digital switch, that grand fiasco that forced the upgrade of every household in America to a digital television signal, Verizon snatched up the 700mz spectrum in an FCC auction to beef up their coverage on the wireless broadband scene. Now, the FCC is talking about reclaiming even more of the spectrum currently devoted to television broadcast and dedicating it to wireless broadband (see FCC Considers Shifting Some TV Airwaves to Broadband).

What's the motivation? Well, it's two-fold -- and I'm not sure which is more important. First, there's money to be made. By reclaiming licenses on certain ranges of the spectrum (currently offered to free broadcast networks) and then reselling those to the more lucrative broadband industry, it's estimated that our government could add over $60 million to their coffers.

Second, however, is the infrastructure that it would augment. As a nation, we still lag behind other developed countries in our ability to provide fast, reliable broadband to everyone everywhere. There's no doubt, especially for rural areas, fixed wireless broadband is the answer. In catching up, the projection is that our businesses will be more competitive. Our small business markets will be strengthened (underpinning a strong economy all around). And, our dear old friends like Verizon and AT&T will have more goodies to hock.

What are the costs to you? Well, there are few drawbacks to the idea of being more efficient and more targeted with our airwaves. There's only so much of a spectrum that can be used, so it makes sense to put those waves to good use in the most needed area: broadband. After all, you can watch tv on the internet now! In the WSJ's article (cited above) there is some talk about converting all free broadcast television to paid subscription. It will be a shock for some at first, but when you think about it, on par with most other forms of modern communication.

What do you think? Would you pay for TV (if you don't already) in the interest of seeing more of America reached with broadband connectivity?

Labels: "Internet infrastructure", FCC, Federal Communications Commission, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Verizon

posted by Nick Carter at 2:33 PM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Texas is a massive state. Second in size only to Alaska, Texas is over a quarter million square miles. And, while it's also second in population in the U.S. with over 24 million people in the great state, 75% of its population reside in the 60,000 square-mile region of booming metropolises like Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio that dot Texas' Eastern portion.

What remains outside of these large cities and towns reaching inward from the Gulf Coast is an expanse that many simply call "West Texas"--as if it were a small sliver of the larger state. In reality, West Texas spans 3x the square mileage of East Texas and is dotted with nearly 2300 rural settlements, called Colonias, characterized by poverty and lack of basic infrastructure.

In the 630-mile drive along Interstate 20 from Dallas to Juarez, you can expect to see no more than one city along the way that boasts more than 100,000 in population. A handful of others dot the trail with a few thousand souls. But for the most part, a whole lot of small towns.

So, if you're ever so inclined to make this drive, think of two things: first, that your A/C is fully charged! Second, when you want to swipe your card at the gas pump... how does anybody get broadband out here? Or, when the officer stops to help you with a flat tire, does he even have email back at his station? How many stores, companies, and even government agencies in this remote part of our country go without the high-speed connectivity many of us take for granted?

The Texas DIR recently tapped into Accel Networks' unique fixed wireless broadband service to provide at least one solution to this problem. Via partner RealCom Solutions, state and local government agencies have special discounted prices for what could be the only broadband solution viable in many areas. More than that, however, commercial applications rely on Accel everyday, too. Point-of-sale, convenience store registers, ATM's, pay at the pump, and just about any retail that requires cardholder data transfer needs not only broadband, but PCI-compliant broadband.

Everything is bigger in Texas, and when it comes to spanning hundreds of miles with a data network with consistent througput and broadband speeds, Texas' size is not always in its favor. Accel Networks is glad to help.

Labels: Convenience Stores, Fixed Wireless Broadband, PCI Compliance, PCI Compliant Broadband, PCI-DSS, Rural Broadband Access, Texas DIR

posted by Nick Carter at 6:15 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, August 4, 2009
I grew up on a small farm in rural Indiana. I can tell you, as soon as I was old enough to understand business and profit, I started wondering how much it cost for one telephone pole to be erected. A digging crew, some heavy machinery, and a chemically-treated piece of lumber cut from a single tree at least 60-feet tall. Add to that the fact that there were hundreds from the nearest sub-station to our farm, and few other homes in between. Then an ice storm came and crews worked round-the-clock to restore power. How can they make any money?

That's just it. "They" didn't make money. We owned the utility together. It was called an Electric Cooperative, and it's the means by which most of the rural U.S. has gotten their electricity in the past century. So, what's the next vital utility for the development of rural communities? Without a doubt: broadband. Broadband is as vital to rural America as the electricity that powers it.

So, can we re-invent a generation-old concept to meet today's infrastructure needs? The Pacific Northwest Internet Service Everywhere (PNWISE) broadband cooperative thinks so. PNWISE is a utility cooperative--much like the electric co-op my parents belonged to--that has endeavored to bring broadband to a 4-state region in the rural Northwest.

And how are they doing it? With Fixed Wireless Broadband, of course. No need to send crews out to erect poles every 200 feet. No need to bury thousands of miles of copper cable and fiber optics in a massive terrestrial network. Fixed Wireless Broadband is the method of choice for today's broadband cooperatives like the PNWISE. It's internet for everyone at a price the member/owners can afford.

Labels: Broadband, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 7:55 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Friday, July 17, 2009
With less than 4 weeks remaining to take action on available grants and loans--all part of a federal stimulus package aimed at beefing up the nation's wired and wireless networks--many providers have yet to take action. Why? Well, these aren't exactly "no strings attached" deals.

Vice President Biden recently announced the availability of $4 billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act loans and grants, which are specifically aimed at bringing rural broadband access to un-served and underserved communities. Nonetheless, providers like CenturyTel, Inc. haven't lifted a finger to tough the funds, which could go a long way in funding their LTE network plans for the coming years. "We just don't know yet," a company spokesman told Unstrung Wednesday. "We're still evaluating the notice that came out at the end of June."

Yet another company, Open Range Communications, is balking at the latest offer after having received a reported $267 Million from the Department of Agriculture's Rural Development Utilities Program (RDUP) in March (a previous edition of a stimulus package aimed at rural broadband access).

With this latest stimulus offer announced by Biden, the deadline for applying for the funds is notably tighter. Companies are faced with deciding whether they can/will accept the terms of the funding while they only learned of said terms as late as July 1st. And, it seems, many may decide the easy money may not be worth the strings it has attached.

Labels: Broadband, Network Providers, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus

posted by Nick Carter at 8:21 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, July 7, 2009
"Broadband is no longer a luxury, it's a necessity; and it's no longer a privilege, it's a right," said Michael Lai, CEO of Packet One, speaking during a panel discussion at the CommunicAsia exhibition in Singapore. Packet One Networks is a provider of fixed wireless broadband throughout Malaysia. Their WiMAX services were introduced just last year, and though coverage is still limited, the company is aggressively growing their network.

In an interview with IDG News Service, Lai commented his belief is to invest when the economy is down. Though only 20 percent of Malaysia currently has broadband access, considerable less than nearby Asian countries like Singapore, the Malaysian government is hopeful they can reach 50% coverage by next year. That's an extremely aggressive growth plan. How will they do it?

Lai, of course, sees fixed wireless broadband as the solution... and so do we. First, the cost to roll out GSM network infrastructure across the rural landscape of Malaysia is far less than creating a terrestrial network from scratch. What's more, the speed of a roll-out is also critical for Packet One Networks' aggressive subscriber growth goals. They hope to turn their 10,000 subscribers today into over 200,000 broadband subscribers by 2010.

There are, of course, obstacles in the way. Not the least of which are the existing cellular providers with 3G broadband capability. Oh yeah, and let's not forget the economy. But it seems in this case, wireless is driving the economy, not the other way around. Malaysia's aggressive push toward rural broadband access coupled with Lai's aggressive growth goals all while capital is tighter than ever means one thing: under these economic conditions, wireless is the only way to drive such growth.

Labels: Broadband, Economy, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 4:38 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Thursday, July 2, 2009
Robert Evatt, a staff writer for the Tulsa World in the nations most stereotypical rural state: Oklahoma (ok, maybe a close second to Kansas) chronicled his recent visit to a rural community and the broadband access that was noticeably absent. Evatt writes: "As it stands, we're creating a sizable gulf between connected areas and disconnected areas."

I noticed something subtle in Robert's experience, and in his commentary thereof, that struck me today. He doesn't say that "there exists" or that "there remains" a gulf. In Robert's estimation, and I would tend to disagree, "we're creating."

Certainly we cannot argue that with less than 70% of homes in America having access to broadband internet, and likely a similar number of businesses, the gulf is undeniable. I call it a gulf because, unless you've live in disconnect, you can't quite appreciate the real isolation it creates. Not just from a social standpoint--the inability to call dad on a cell--but the business disadvantage, ecommerce breakdown, etc. Can you imagine a local grocer who relies on imprint machines?

However, this gulf is being filled in faster than midway of Chicago. I don't agree that we're (any longer) creating a gulf. In years past, perhaps the ISP's and tcom giants were blind to the impacts of leaving rural areas behind. But today, we're seeing companies like AT&T step up to the rural broadband challenge. Organizations like the Internet for Everyone are rallying to the cause.

I applaud the fact that we are today bridging the gap for rural broadband with fixed wireless broadband technology.

Labels: ATT, Broadband, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 3:35 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, June 9, 2009
We reported several months ago on this Broadband Stimulus Package, all the promise of growth and a new era of broadband leadership in America, and of course, the opportunity to chime in about wireless broadband. Well, several readers on Wired.com have chimed in, but unfortunately not through the proper channels.

It seems that most of the formal feedback requests have been completed by the telecom providers that can afford to pay someone to chase the paper trail required for submission. The more casual readers, however, have resorted to the more casual feedback system: comments.

And yet, though there may seem to be no bridge between the formalities of Capital Hill and the "new-fangled blog thingies" on the Internet, Wired.com has spanned the gap. In a formal submission to the FCC, Wired sifted through the chaff and assembled the top comments from their blog(s) into one coherent document for the FCC to review. You can read the FCC submission here.

The problem, of course, is that the comments don't amount to a cohesive message. There's conflicting ideas, not the least of which is the devotion to terrestrial networks (fiber optics and copper cables) and of course, Fixed Wireless Broadband like wimax, 3G, and 4G. So, whose voice will be louder? Have you weighed in yet? Download the form.

Labels: Broadband, FCC, Fixed Wireless Broadband, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus

posted by Nick Carter at 8:27 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Several weeks ago, we reported through various posts about the scuttle over Obama's multi-billion dollar stimulus plan to increase broadband availability across the nation. Not surprisingly, Accel's position: go wireless! You can read about this in our previous post Internet for Everyone: The Technology That Can Make It Happen.

When I opened my news today, I was pleased to read a headline very familiar to me: Opinion: Mobile technology, not broadband, is the way to connect America. Now, it didn't take long to realize we use slightly different nomenclature. You see, I would consider a fixed wireless broadband solution as indeed a broadband solution. Of course, what this author meant by the term was what we might distinguish as "terrestrial networks." Nonetheless, the article went on to comment:

"When it comes to deciding where to put our money, we should actually be following in the footsteps of the developing world. Countries like India and China are using mobile technologies to leapfrog much more expensive wired and wireless infrastructure investments. Over 60 percent of all people on the planet have access to cell phones, while only 20 percent have computers or are connected to the Internet."

This couldn't be more accurate. Last year, I visited Indonesia. As I sat on a remote island in a village barely equipped with electricity, I checked my email on a GSM fixed wireless broadband connection. Why? Just as columnist Paul Lamb pointed out above, it's incomparably cheaper to build cell towers than lay cable.

The only question, then, is whether the goal of the broadband stimulus plan here in the U.S. is to save money... or to spend money [grin].

Labels: Fixed Wireless Broadband, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus, WCAI

posted by Nick Carter at 5:23 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Friday, May 29, 2009
The world cheered when a new, supposedly revolutionary piece of wireless broadband hardware was released in Barcelona this February at the GSMA Mobile World Congress. The new hardware, a PC-Only wireless modem, was introduced by Telstra and promised 21 Mbps peak connection speeds. So, why doesn't every retail store, c-store, and hospitality center in the world have one by now?

Probably because there simply isn't enough bandwidth served through the GSM to actually keep up with the modem's capability. If 21 Mbps were attainable for every wireless broadband user, even just for the business users, then we would have likely heard a lot more about this over the past 5 months, and probably seen competitors clamoring to compete. But that hasn't been the case.

Instead, focus has been on beefing up the infrastructure to meet the existing demands of an ever increasing user base of fixed wireless broadband. We recently reported on one such effort by Verizon who upped it's wireless broadband capacity in one suburban area, foregoing new terrestrial network construction.

When ZDNet tested Telstra's hardware in Australia (the only market it's available in at present), they experienced peak performance at 6 Mbps, and averages at only half that. One can't help but notice the word "theoretical" pasted all throughout their review, and a direct quote from Telstra's own material stating, "customers will experience typical user download speeds of 550Kbps – 8Mbps." That's quite a range. Why the gap between the peak experienced and the peak theorized? Simple. Network capacity. Joseph Hanlon stated it like this: "Theoretically the network is capable of delivering 21Mbps but only if you parked yourself immediately next to a base station, and accessed an uncongested network."

So, where does the wireless broadband industry need to turn next? New client-side hardware? No. We look forward to seeing major providers continue building and enhancing their infrastructure to meet increasing demands--both rural and urban. That is the only first step toward a wireless world.

Labels: Broadband, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 7:16 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Thursday, May 14, 2009
According to Tim Greene at Computer World, Verizon has unloaded much of its terrestrial broadband network lines. As for the reasons why, they should come as no surprise: Verizon is all about Wireless Broadband.

Greene commented that Verizon's decision to unload such a large amount of infrastructure--$8.6 Billion worth to be precise--is simple: these assets "don't align with its core businesses." In fact, the more notable news to me was learning that Verizon ever owned over $8 Billion in copper cable and fiber optics.

The buyer, Frontier Communications, sees value in the assets as part of their mission to bring broadband access to rural areas. Most of the network being sold serves rural areas across the U.S. While we applaud Frontier for their dedication to that service, I still have to shake my head wondering, "isn't wireless broadband a better way to serve rural areas?"

All in all, I'm convinced this is an excellent move for Verizon, increasing capital that can be applied to the more pertinent task of building their fixed wireless infrastructure. As for the rural access, we shall wait and see what Frontier makes of their new growth.

Labels: Broadband, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Verizon

posted by Nick Carter at 5:12 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, May 12, 2009
How often do you find headlines that read like this: "Sidewalks Destroyed and Sod Ripped Up as Miles of Fiberoptics are Laid to Increase Broadband Capacity." Not very often. When major tcom companies like Verizon need to increase broadband capacity to meet demand, more and more often they're turning to fixed wireless broadband solutions.

That was the case with this morning's announcement that Verizon Wireless Increases Wireless Broadband Capacity in Watertown Area. According to their press release, this wasn't just for your average teenager downloading videos and music. Verizon has a serious interest in "the company's high-speed wireless broadband network geared toward mobile professionals and business customers."

What is most notable to me, however, is the speed at which the upscaling can occur on wireless broadband networks. As I parodied the downsides to beefing up wireline networks--major construction that entails destruction in its path--there is a serious side to the benefits of leveraging a growing GSM network. Think about the costs and time-to-market that would be required for copper cable and fiberoptics to deliver the same bandwidth capacity that Verizon's 10 new cell sites will offer. Wireless Broadband is, without a doubt, the answer to expanding broadband coverage.

Labels: Broadband, Coverage, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Verizon

posted by Nick Carter at 5:56 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, April 21, 2009
In March, the FCC auctioned licenses to the 700MHz spectrum which was made available by the nation-wide mandated transition to digital TV. Who wound up owning the vast majority of those licenses? Verizon Wireless. The FCC raised $19.6 Billion but the real winner was Verizon Wireless, who now estimates they will have enough network to reach every corner of rural America with 4G fixed wireless broadband access.

Aside from the fact that infrastructure already exists all over the nation for broadcasting this spectrum; And, not to mention that receivers and devices on this spectrum have been developed and redeveloped since the dawn of television; It's the physics of the waves that makes Verizon, and all of the broadband industry, excited to see what develops. The 700MHz spectrum waves can travel long distances and propagate through walls, which makes it ideal for covering broad, geographically dispersed regions of the U.S.

As we wrote about a while back, fixed wireless broadband has always been the most feasible technology for bringing internet to rural areas. That fact has not changed. What this purchase means, however, is that one of the most technically capable spectrum in air waves is now under the control of one of the nations largest telecom companies, Verizon, with the express mission of bringing delivering broadband to more Americans than ever.

When can we expect to see the roll-out begin? Verizon plans to begin building a 4G network as early as 2010. However, reaching every household could take years. Whatever the time frame, this purchase marks an exciting new era for wireless broadband.

Labels: Broadband, Coverage, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Verizon

posted by Nick Carter at 5:18 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, March 31, 2009
We've heard about it. We know it's coming. We've even been invited to interact with the NTIA and FCC. So, how are providers of fixed wireless broadband solutions responding? We heard one report that made me jump for joy (and start pricing airfare).

Andy Vamvakias of Premium Choice Broadband in Maine took it upon himself to advocate for the entire state of Main with regard to the broadband stimulus funds that are being made available. Under his won volition, Andy flew to DC to lobby not only for his small broadband provider but for his great state to get a piece of the pie. "There is no guarantee that stimulus money of any significant amount will come to Maine," he said. "If we don't move quickly and convincingly, we stand to lose it."

Andy's position is that the funds should be made available directly to businesses who can put it to use quickest, as opposed to trickling down through the usual bureaucratic channels of government grants and the like. In Andy's case, he believes he could spend 10 million in a matter of weeks, creating work for 10-20 people and providing broadband network access to currently unserved or underserved areas.

I'd like to go on record with a hearty "here-here" for Andy. What are your thoughts on how the funds could be used in your area for the best economic gain? And, what are you doing about it?

Labels: Broadband, FCC, Fixed Wireless Broadband, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus

posted by Nick Carter at 7:07 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Monday, March 16, 2009
The $7.2 Billion that the NTIA and FCC now have on their hands created a flood of over 2000 individual requests for meetings and follow-ups from advocacy groups, local and state government agencies, and private companies all across the U.S. Following the first of several public meetings on the topic, we now have a systematic means for follow-up. The agencies have released an RFI form requesting information relevant to the proper handling of these funds.

You can download the form at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/frnotices/2009/FR_BTOP_RFI_090312.pdf. Don't be shocked to find a lengthy form. No doubt, in part, to weed out those deeply interested in the process from the casual squalkers. But, if you (like us) desire to see the funds used appropriately in the rollout of broadband access for the U.S., we encourage you to take the time.

Labels: Broadband, Economy, FCC, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus

posted by Nick Carter at 11:06 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Friday, March 13, 2009
We have talked a lot recently about the recent stimulus package and it's impact on wireless broadband investments in the U.S. There's no word on whether AT&T's recently announced plans were motivated (or even funded) by the stimulus, but whatever the source, the results are obvious: 3,000 jobs alone will be created in AT&T's next initiative to ramp-up 3G networks across America.

According to Network World, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson says that despite the current recession, AT&T needs to invest heavily in wireless capacity to keep up with consumer demand for bandwidth. Their plans include nearly doubling their 3G presence in the U.S., which entails nearly 2100 new GSM-based cell sites.

So, with AT&T upping the ante, what will the other major providers do with their broadband stimulus funds? What we expect (and hope) to see is the race begin to lead the U.S. in wireless broadband connectivity among Sprint, Verizon, and AT&T. It appears AT&T has jumped out to a lead, at least in what they've promised. But if there is one thing Capitalism assures, it's that where one company ventures, more will follow. Competition drove us to where we are in technology today, and it is driving us to the future as we speak.

See the full article in Yahoo Finance: AT&T to Add 3000 Jobs...

Labels: Broadband, Economy, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus

posted by Nick Carter at 6:16 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Thursday, March 5, 2009
With over $7.2 billion at stake, there has been no shortage of banter over where the money should be spent. A simple google search for "broadband stimulus" yields hundreds of thousands of recent news entries and blogger buzz about the topic. So, what do we know as of now?

First, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS) will handle a portion of the funds. I originally was led to believe (probably through one of the numerous sources chattering about the topic on the internet these days) that the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) would be the exclusive administrator of Obama's stimulus, but it appears I was incorrect.

However, I'm glad to have been found mistaken. Ron Schott, an Arizona news man, points out in his recent article on the broadband stimulus package, that with the RUS in charge, it could mean 80-95% of the largely rural state of Arizona receives coverage. Some people expressed disappointment over the historic allocation of funds that the RUS approved, stating that the money doesn't always end up at the most rural of areas. In either regard, I say that I'm pleased t see this development because I believe it will mean more money invested in rural infrastructure rather than floating the major carriers with loans and grants to "improve" existing networks.

As per my previous article over the allocation of these funds to wireless broadband technology, no definitive answer has been given. But, rest assured the industry is lobbying hard to make sure we get our cut. Fred Campbell, president of The Wireless Communication Association International (WCAI) stated, “WCAI applauds the inclusion in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill of funding for the delivery of wireless broadband to underserved areas.” He also commented, "As the only broadband platform that is capable of providing access everywhere, all the time, wireless broadband is essential to achieving universal broadband connectivity."

Where will the dollars fall, we aren't certain yet. I will be keeping my ear to the rail, hopefully the train's-a-comin'.

Labels: Broadband, Economy, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access, Stimulus, WCAI

posted by Nick Carter at 3:49 PM Link to this Article  0 Comments

Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Everyone seems to be talking about the stimulus package these days, and the telecom industry is no different. The National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) got a $4.7 Billion chunk of Obama's stimulus bucket-o-money, and they're looking for ways to spend it. Where would be the most economical (yes, even I have to drop the buzz word) place to spend that money?

Consider the costs of laying thousands of miles of copper cable across the deserts, mountains, and tundras where broadband access is still unattainable. Now, consider this: depending on terrain and other circumstances, a GSM tower can substutute for anywhere from 4 to 50 miles of hard wiring. Not only that, but when considering manpower for installation and the ongoing maintenance, the total cost of ownership (in this case, our own taxpayer ownership) is dramatically lower.

But doesn't that defeat the purpose? I thought we wanted more work, more jobs, and more product purchased so as to stimulate the economy. That's true, but the simple fact is that if the $4.7 Billion doesn't all get eaten up in broadband, rest assured, they'll find other places to spend it.

If you'd like to get involved, learn more about the NTIA and the Broadband Grant Program Meetings.

Labels: Broadband, Economy, NTIA, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 5:38 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments


You may have heard of a recently launched and rapidly growing advocacy group called Internet for Everyone. The premise of the group is easily surmised: they are creating awareness of the lack of broadband access for rural and under-developed areas of the U.S. And, while much of the sentiment on their website may remind you of a social movement, their interests appear to be very much business-focused, realizing that where businesses can get online, there the economic growth will bring the rest of the community along.

One of the hottest topics for Internet for Everyone today is the recently approved stimulus package which includes billions for internet infrastructure. Telecom companies around the nation will be awarded huge projects for building the infrastructure that will bring broadband connectivity to rural areas.

But is this effort too narrowly focused? When I visited Indonesia last year, I was surprised to learn that the entire nation had totally skipped the wired telephone age. By the time they were ready to build their nation's telecom infrastructure, it no longer made sense to go wired. Today, they are a nation of wireless users. The same phenomenon has happened all across developing countries. So why not the developing regions of this great country?

In fact, fixed wireless broadband is already delivering connectivity to places where wired connection is impractical or impossible. Take a look at our coverage map and you'll see that Accel provides 2.5-3g speed to over 80% of the U.S. without a single copper line laid. If you're still in an area without coverage, broadband access may be closer than you realize. Let's talk.

Labels: Broadband, Coverage, Rural Broadband Access

posted by Nick Carter at 4:57 AM Link to this Article  0 Comments